The Toyota Corolla hatch was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in August 2018. This ANCAP safety rating applies to all petrol and hybrid hatch variants.
Test Results Summary
| Crash Test | Score |
|
|---|
| Adult Occupant Protection |
36.60 |
out of 38 |
| Frontal Offset Test |
7.31 |
out of 8 |
| Full Width Frontal Test |
7.57 |
out of 8 |
| Side Impact Test |
8 |
out of 8 |
| Oblique Pole Test |
8 |
out of 8 |
| Whiplash Protection Test |
1.72 |
out of 2 |
| AEB (City) |
4 |
out of 4 |
| Child Occupant Protection |
40.91 |
out of 49 |
| Safety Assist |
9.90 |
out of 13 |
| Speed Assistance Systems |
2.25 |
out of 3 |
| Seat Belt Reminders |
3 |
out of 3 |
| Lane Support Systems |
2.25 |
out of 4 |
| AEB (Interurban) |
2.40 |
out of 3 |
| Vulnerable Road User Protection |
41.37 |
out of 48 |
| AEB (Pedestrian) |
5.97 |
out of 6 |
| AEB (Cyclist) |
5.33 |
out of 6 |
Safety Feature Summary
The safety feature information below is subject to change without notice. For up to date safety feature specifications for all variants, please see the safety feature table to the right or contact the manufacturer.
Dual frontal, side chest-protecting and side head-protecting (curtain) airbags and a driver knee airbag are standard.
All three grades of autonomous emergency braking (City, Interurban & Vulnerable Road User) as well as lane keep assist (LKA) with lane departure warning (LDW) are standard on all variants.
ANCAP & UCSR Rating ExplainedThis shows the differences between the rating processes.
Find out more
Frontal Offset Crash Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Frontal Offset*
|
7.31
|
pts
|
(out of
8)
|
|
Head/Neck
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
2.7
|
pts
|
|
|
Upper Legs
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Lower Legs
|
3.94
|
pts
|
|
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings showed ADEQUATE protection of the driver’s chest and lower leg of both the driver and front passenger. Protection was GOOD for all other critical body areas of both the driver and front passenger.
Side Impact Test Results
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Side Impact*
|
8
|
pts
|
(out of
8)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Abdomen
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Pelvis
|
4
|
pts
|
|
In the side impact test and the oblique pole test, protection offered to all critical body regions was GOOD and maximum points were scored in these tests.
Full Width Frontal Test
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Driver*
|
|
pts
|
(out of
)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Neck
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
3.69
|
pts
|
|
|
Upper Legs
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Rear Passenger*
|
|
pts
|
(out of
)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Neck
|
3.82
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
2.77
|
pts
|
|
|
Upper Legs
|
4
|
pts
|
|
In the full width frontal test, protection was ADEQUATE for the chest of the driver and chest and neck of the rear passenger. GOOD protection was offered to all other critical body regions of both the driver and rear passenger.
Pole Test
|
Region
|
Score
|
Score Type
|
Maximum Score
|
|
Pole*
|
|
pts
|
(out of
)
|
|
Head
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Chest
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Abdomen
|
4
|
pts
|
|
|
Pelvis
|
4
|
pts
|
|
Whiplash Protection Test
Rear: 0.38 points
Front: 1.35 points
Child Protection Test
In the frontal offset test, protection of the head of the 6 year dummy and neck of both the 6 and 10 year dummies was ADEQUATE, while the protection offered to all other body regions was GOOD.
Protection of both child dummies in the side impact test was GOOD, with maximum points scored.
The Toyota Corolla hatch is fitted with lower ISOFix anchorages on the rear outboard seats and top tether anchorages for all rear seating positions.
Installation of typical child restraints available in Australia and New Zealand showed GOOD results and the Corolla scored full points for this assessment.
![]()
Pedestrian Summary
The bonnet provided mostly GOOD or ADEQUATE protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of its surface. Some MARGINAL results were recorded at the base of the windscreen, with POOR results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.
Protection of pedestrians’ legs and pelvis was GOOD at all test locations.
The autonomous emergency braking system is capable of detecting and reacting to vulnerable road users including pedestrians and cyclists. The AEB system offered GOOD performance in tests of its effectiveness in pedestrian test
scenarios under both daylight and night-time conditions. GOOD performance was also seen in cyclist test scenarios with collisions avoided or mitigated at almost all test speeds.
Pedestrian Rating Explained
The Australasian New Car Assessment Program (ANCAP) provides consumers with independent and transparent information on the level of occupant and pedestrian protection provided by different new car models, in the most common types of crashes, through its star rating program.
Find out more
Green Vehicle Guide
|
Combined Fuel Consumption
|
CO2
|
Greenhouse Rating
|
Air Pollution Rating
|
Overall Rating
|
|
6.7 L/100km
|
156 g/km
|
|
|
|
Base Model Safety Features
Legend
Standard
Not Available
Optional
No Information
The latest UCSR are based on statistics collected from car crashes in Australia and New Zealand between 1990 and 2017, where someone was killed or seriously injured. Over eight million police reported crashes were analysed in the latest UCSR.
